Bug#563705: MPI implementations in squeeze

2010-03-16 Thread Adam C Powell IV
tags 563705 +patch thanks Hi and apologies for the long delay... On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 14:55 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 20:22 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 26/02/10 at 10:46 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 20:49 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wr

Bug#563705: MPI implementations in squeeze

2010-02-26 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le vendredi 26 février 2010 à 09:54 +, Alastair McKinstry a écrit : > > > Perhaps using pkg-config (an mpi.pc file) would be a better solution to > this; it is more > standard: the mpicc, etc. approach isn't very scalable, you can't wrap > every complex > library. Use mpi.pc to point to where

Bug#563705: MPI implementations in squeeze

2010-02-26 Thread Alastair McKinstry
On 25/02/10 at 14:22 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 18:10 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: There is not much progress so far with respect to changing mpi-defaults to use MPICH2 instead of LAM on the architectures where Open MPI is not available yet. This needs a roun

Bug#563705: MPI implementations in squeeze

2010-02-25 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 25/02/10 at 14:22 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 18:10 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > There is not much progress so far with respect to changing mpi-defaults > > > > to use MPICH2 instead of LAM on the architectures where Open MPI is not > > > > available yet. This

Bug#563705: MPI implementations in squeeze

2010-02-25 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 18:10 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > There is not much progress so far with respect to changing mpi-defaults > > > to use MPICH2 instead of LAM on the architectures where Open MPI is not > > > available yet. This needs a round of binNMUs. Marc Brockschmidt said he > > > wi