Bug#563726: [Bug 552320] Handling AT_FDCWD as EBADF in glibc's utimens() causes tar failures

2010-01-05 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake wrote: ... > s/futimes/futimens/ (ChangeLog and commit message) Thanks! >> +++ b/lib/utimens.c >> @@ -264,19 +264,20 @@ fdutimens (char const *file, int fd, struct timespec >> const timespec[2]) >> } >> # endif /* HAVE_UTIMENSAT */ >> # if HAVE_FUTIMENS >> - { >> -

Bug#563726: [Bug 552320] Handling AT_FDCWD as EBADF in glibc's utimens() causes tar failures

2010-01-05 Thread Eric Blake
According to Jim Meyering on 1/5/2010 2:07 PM: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552320 > Thanks for the heads up. Good timing. > That does indeed look like a bug, and Aurelien Jarno's fix seems right. I can confirm that the fix is correct. > > I expect to push the following to gnu

Bug#563726: [Bug 552320] Handling AT_FDCWD as EBADF in glibc's utimens() causes tar failures

2010-01-05 Thread Jim Meyering
bugzi...@redhat.com wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552320 > > Ondrej Vasik changed: > >What|Removed |Added > > CC||j..