clone 640495 -1
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 RM: spfmilter -- RoM; unmaintained upstream, dep to be dropped from
sid
severity -1 normal
thanks
Hi Mike,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 05:37:35PM -0800, Mike Markley wrote:
I did reply -- only I forgot to actually send it. Oops.
oops, ok. :)
clone 564576 -1
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 RM: libspf -- RoQA; unmaintained, buggy
severity -1 normal
thanks
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 12:05:55PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:56:32AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I replied directly, rather than to the bug by
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 02:07:14PM +0100, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
clone 564576 -1
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 RM: libspf -- RoQA; unmaintained, buggy
severity -1 normal
thanks
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 12:05:55PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at
Mike,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 07:06:10PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:16:20PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Upgrading now. I'll ask for libspf0's removal at the end of the
month.
You can remove whitelsiter, I don't maintain (upstream) it anymore.
any opinion about
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:16:20PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
severity 640496 serious
severity 640495 serious
thanks
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 12:05:55PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:56:32AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I replied directly, rather than to the bug
retitle 640496 RM: whitelister -- ROM; unmaintained upstream, obsolete
reassign 640496 ftp.debian.org
thanks
Hi Pierre,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 07:06:10PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
You can remove whitelsiter, I don't maintain (upstream) it anymore.
then let's do that. ;)
Kind regards and
severity 640496 serious
severity 640495 serious
thanks
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 12:05:55PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:56:32AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I replied directly, rather than to the bug by mistake.
I will contact the maintainers of the two rdepends
clone 564576 -1
clone 564576 -2
reassign -1 spfmilter
severity -1 important
retitle -1 libspf0 going away
reassign -2 whitelister
severity -2 important
retitle -2 libspf0 going away
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:56:32AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I replied directly, rather than to the bug by
I replied directly, rather than to the bug by mistake.
I will contact the maintainers of the two rdepends (spfmilter and whitelister)
to see if they will fix libspf0, port their packages to libspf2 (which does
support IPv6), or have them removed.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Also, I think it does warrant RC severity due to dataloss potential, not due
to release goals. Wheezy will be released in 1.5 - 2 years and supported
until a year after Wheezy +1. That means 4 - 5 years. In that time frame I
think it's highly likely that incorrectly rejecting mail due to
I think this should be RC for Wheezy as libspf appears to completely lack IPv6
support.
$ spfqtool -i 2607:f0d0:3001:aa::2 -s sc...@mailout03.controlledmail.com -h
mailout03.controlledmail.com
SPF short result: fail
SPF verbose result: policy result: [fail] from rule [-all]
RFC2822 header:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:00, Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com wrote:
I think this should be RC for Wheezy as libspf appears to completely lack IPv6
support.
why? IPv6 support is a release goal for wheezy, and RG does not
warrant a RC severity: please fix it.
[1]
12 matches
Mail list logo