Bug#564871: texlive-full: Please create a BD package

2010-01-14 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 13.01.10 Frank Küster (fr...@debian.org) wrote: Hi, Hm, shouldn't we rather restrict this to full latex and fonts? I admit that this is today most of texlive; but XeTeX-, LuaTeX- and ConTeXt-related stuff is going to grow, and there's little chance that they will be used much by build

Bug#564871: texlive-full: Please create a BD package

2010-01-13 Thread Frank Küster
Hilmar Preusse hill...@web.de wrote: Package: texlive-full Version: 2009-7 Severity: wishlist Hi, as discussed in #564241: some maintainers don't like to specify all single packages they need for building the docs in the BDs. The reason is that the packages may change (some LaTeX classes

Bug#564871: texlive-full: Please create a BD package

2010-01-12 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Package: texlive-full Version: 2009-7 Severity: wishlist Hi, as discussed in #564241: some maintainers don't like to specify all single packages they need for building the docs in the BDs. The reason is that the packages may change (some LaTeX classes move from one to the other, etc). Hence they