On 13.01.10 Frank Küster (fr...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi,
Hm, shouldn't we rather restrict this to full latex and fonts? I
admit that this is today most of texlive; but XeTeX-, LuaTeX- and
ConTeXt-related stuff is going to grow, and there's little chance
that they will be used much by build
Hilmar Preusse hill...@web.de wrote:
Package: texlive-full
Version: 2009-7
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
as discussed in #564241: some maintainers don't like to specify all single
packages they need for building the docs in the BDs. The reason is that the
packages may change (some LaTeX classes
Package: texlive-full
Version: 2009-7
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
as discussed in #564241: some maintainers don't like to specify all single
packages they need for building the docs in the BDs. The reason is that the
packages may change (some LaTeX classes move from one to the other, etc).
Hence they
3 matches
Mail list logo