Bug#565318: [Pkg-bluetooth-maintainers] Bug#565318: Bug#565318: Bug#565318: obexd-server thought as the new implementation of the old obex-data-server

2010-01-28 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
severity 555133 important thanks Hi, all. 2010/1/26 Andrea Veri a...@debian.org: On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: I confirmed that obexd-server set it in Conflict in obexd. I think that DBUS-name doen't conflict now because user cannot install these at the same time. Yes, I

Bug#565318: [Pkg-bluetooth-maintainers] Bug#565318: Bug#565318: Bug#565318: obexd-server thought as the new implementation of the old obex-data-server

2010-01-25 Thread Andrea Veri
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: I confirmed that obexd-server set it in Conflict in obexd. I think that DBUS-name doen't conflict now because user cannot install these at the same time. Ideally the best thing to do would be to change the namespaces of the obexd-server package

Bug#565318: [Pkg-bluetooth-maintainers] Bug#565318: Bug#565318: Bug#565318: obexd-server thought as the new implementation of the old obex-data-server

2010-01-25 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, 2010/1/22 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.org: I understood that they did not want to change DBUS-name each other. I think that we have to take the method how user cannot install obex-data-serve and obexd in at the same time in Debian. How do you think abaout this idea? I