Martin Koegler wrote:
I must admit, that I have not read anything about GNU maintainers,
but GNU has usually a bigger philosophical overhead.
Then I suggest you to read the appropriate documenation [1] before
jumping to premature and possibly incorrect conclusions (what does the
phrase
(OTOH, speaking generally, it is sad to see a package reborn under
another name just because the prospective new maintainer cannot
communicate successfully with the original one to negotiate the
takeover. I once again urge you to write to maintain...@gnu.org to
avoid this unpleasant
Marc Leeman wrote:
(OTOH, speaking generally, it is sad to see a package reborn
under another name just because
Don't read to much into this;
Well, as a matter of fact I don't. Probably I wouldn't have replied
to the thread if pth wasn't a GNU package, but my opinion would be the
same.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:48:24AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Martin Koegler, le Tue 19 Jan 2010 09:27:07 +0100, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit :
* Package name: pthsem
Mmm, could this perhaps
I need pthsem, so I only want a working version with all features I
need.
All I care about is that there is an agreement between the Debian
community and the upstream developer. Martin is very active in
supporting his environment and in that respect I am to inclined to
support his decision.
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit :
* Package name: pthsem
Mmm, could this perhaps rather be just a patch added to the existing pth
package? Else you'll have to share the Debian patches.
The situation with GNU pth is:
*
Martin Koegler, le Tue 19 Jan 2010 09:27:07 +0100, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit :
* Package name: pthsem
Mmm, could this perhaps rather be just a patch added to the existing pth
package? Else you'll
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Martin Koegler, le Tue 19 Jan 2010 09:27:07 +0100, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit :
* Package name : pthsem
[..]
The problem is
Samuel Thibault wrote:
Martin Koegler, le Tue 19 Jan 2010 09:27:07 +0100, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit :
* Package name: pthsem
Mmm, could this perhaps rather be just a patch added to the
existing
JFTR.
Cheers,
Flo
---BeginMessage---
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit :
* Package name: pthsem
Mmm, could this perhaps rather be just a patch added to the existing pth
package? Else you'll have to share the Debian
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marc Leeman marc.lee...@gmail.com
* Package name: pthsem
Version : 2.0.7
Upstream Author : Martin Koegler mkoeg...@auto.tuwien.ac.at
* URL : http://www.auto.tuwien.ac.at/~mkoegler/index.php
* License : GPL
Programming
11 matches
Mail list logo
