Bug#566249: Missing support for broken "SONAME libfoo.so"

2010-01-22 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Raphael Hertzog writes: > On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> in the process of packaging the Intel pro c/c++ compiler I run into >> the problem that their libraries have broken "SONAME libfoo.so". They >> do not have any soversion at all. Because of this dpkg-shlibdeps >> ignores

Bug#566249: Missing support for broken "SONAME libfoo.so"

2010-01-22 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Guillem Jover writes: > Hi! > > On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 13:55:00 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Package: dpkg-dev >> Version: 1.15.4.1 >> Severity: normal >> File: /usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps > >> in the process of packaging the Intel pro c/c++ compiler I run into >> the problem that their libra

Bug#566249: Missing support for broken "SONAME libfoo.so"

2010-01-22 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 13:55:00 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.15.4.1 > Severity: normal > File: /usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps > in the process of packaging the Intel pro c/c++ compiler I run into > the problem that their libraries have broken "SONAME libfoo.so".

Bug#566249: Missing support for broken "SONAME libfoo.so"

2010-01-22 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: dpkg-dev Version: 1.15.4.1 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps Hi, in the process of packaging the Intel pro c/c++ compiler I run into the problem that their libraries have broken "SONAME libfoo.so". They do not have any soversion at all. Because of this dpkg-shlibdeps ignores