Bug#567132: Libgda4 package outdated

2010-02-03 Thread Piotr Pokora
Attaching new patch: * version bump * added myself to uploaders Piotras Index: debian/control.in === --- debian/control.in (wersja 22890) +++ debian/control.in (kopia robocza) @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: libs Priority: optional

Bug#567132: Libgda4 package outdated

2010-02-03 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 03/02/10 11:59, Piotr Pokora wrote: Attaching new patch: * version bump * added myself to uploaders Piotras Uploaded! Cheers, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#567132: Libgda4 package outdated

2010-01-29 Thread Piotr Pokora
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort pisze: On 28/01/10 21:30, Piotr Pokora wrote: and removes uploader section. Why? I thought it was supposed to be not NMU, which means maintainer is an uploader. Piotras -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#567132: Libgda4 package outdated

2010-01-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 29/01/10 09:10, Piotr Pokora wrote: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort pisze: On 28/01/10 21:30, Piotr Pokora wrote: and removes uploader section. Why? I thought it was supposed to be not NMU, which means maintainer is an uploader. An MU means the one who uploads (i.e. the one listed in the

Bug#567132: Libgda4 package outdated

2010-01-28 Thread Piotr Pokora
Josselin Mouette pisze: Hi! If needed I can prepare new patch which includes all your suggestions. It can be a good exercise :) The one attached doesn't change much. Just fixes duplicated dependency and removes uploader section. Please also test the package; if you have an application

Bug#567132: Libgda4 package outdated

2010-01-28 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 28/01/10 21:30, Piotr Pokora wrote: and removes uploader section. Why? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#567132: Libgda4 package outdated

2010-01-27 Thread Piotr Pokora
Package: libgda-4.0-4 Version: 4.0.4-1 Libgda4 package is outdated and should provide newest upstream release, which includes many bugfixes in upstream itself. Attaching debian files patch. Piotras Index: debian/control === ---

Bug#567132: Libgda4 package outdated

2010-01-27 Thread Piotr Pokora
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort pisze: Hi Piotr, Hi! -Build-Depends: cdbs (= 0.4.41), +Build-Depends: cdbs (= 0.4.65), - libglib2.0-dev (= 2.16), + libglib2.0-dev (= 2.22), - libxml2-dev (= 2.4.22), + libxml2-dev (= 2.7.3), You didn't mention why you bumped these build dependencies in your

Bug#567132: Libgda4 package outdated

2010-01-27 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi Piotr, On 27/01/10 17:04, Piotr Pokora wrote: Libgda4 package is outdated and should provide newest upstream release, which includes many bugfixes in upstream itself. Attaching debian files patch. Thanks for looking at libgda! I have some comments wrt your patch: -Build-Depends: cdbs (=

Bug#567132: Libgda4 package outdated

2010-01-27 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 27 janvier 2010 à 17:04 +0100, Piotr Pokora a écrit : Libgda4 package is outdated and should provide newest upstream release, which includes many bugfixes in upstream itself. Attaching debian files patch. Thanks for your proposal for help. Unfortunately there are several issues

Bug#567132: Libgda4 package outdated

2010-01-27 Thread Piotr Pokora
Josselin Mouette pisze: - libxml2-dev (= 2.4.22), + libxml2-dev (= 2.7.3), Same here. Why bump this dependency? Because libxml2-dev can not be less than 2.7.3 in debian unstable. The same applies to cdbs and libglib2.0-dev. It's absolutely safe from upstream

Bug#567132: Libgda4 package outdated

2010-01-27 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 27 janvier 2010 à 18:09 +0100, Piotr Pokora a écrit : Josselin Mouette pisze: - libxml2-dev (= 2.4.22), + libxml2-dev (= 2.7.3), Same here. Why bump this dependency? Because libxml2-dev can not be less than 2.7.3 in debian unstable. The same