]] Tourneur Henry-Nicolas
| * License : No license, only a copyright file
Surely that makes it illegal for us to distribute?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:37:08AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Tourneur Henry-Nicolas
| * License : No license, only a copyright file
Surely that makes it illegal for us to distribute?
Actually, it does have a license, which is in the COPYING file and at the top
of all the
Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no Ecrivait:
]] Tourneur Henry-Nicolas
| * License : No license, only a copyright file
Surely that makes it illegal for us to distribute?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
Yeah but what Craig
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 11:06:28AM +0100, Henry-Nicolas Tourneur wrote:
| * License : No license, only a copyright file
Surely that makes it illegal for us to distribute?
Yeah but what Craig Small said on mentors is that looks very much like a MIT
license - see COPYING file.
Guus Sliepen g...@debian.org Ecrivait:
So it's more some kind of errors from my side because that wasn't very
clear.
Should I update this bug to put MIT-like as license ?
It's better to include the whole license if it isn't exactly equal to a
standard license.
I'll update the package
On Feb 03, Guus Sliepen g...@debian.org wrote:
But, that's still a license. But look carefully, it says without fee in the
license. I don't know if that means you can use it without paying anyone or
you can only redistribute it if you don't charge anyone.
The first meaning is the one widely
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tourneur Henry-Nicolas henry.nico...@tourneur.be
* Package name: tacacs+
Version : 4.0.4.19
Upstream Author : Shrubbery
* URL : http://www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/
* License : No license, only a copyright file
7 matches
Mail list logo
