Hi Adrian,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 08:08:25AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:44:48AM +0400, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:30:05 +0400
Alexander Gerasiov g...@cs.msu.su wrote:
Sorry guys. I'm totally busy with other tasks last month
Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:08:25 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Hello Alexander!
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:44:48AM +0400, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:30:05 +0400
Alexander Gerasiov g...@cs.msu.su wrote:
Sorry guys. I'm totally busy
On 02/24/2014 09:25 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
You should also have asked yourself why Uwe had added those overrides
and not just silently commented them out. If someone adds extra
overrides, he usually has very good reasons. You should have asked Uwe
about that.
This is wrong, the overrides
Hi Alexander!
On 02/24/2014 09:59 AM, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
Unfortunately I missed to fixup pair of changes when build package,
that's why second revision was uploaded right after first.
You are talking about revision -1 which really had some issues.
Please comment on the last version
Hi Alexander, hi Adrian,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:31:27AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 02/24/2014 09:59 AM, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
I think you did not get clean with this or that's Uwe who mislead you.
Yep. I misunderstood Uwe. From his first comments it appeared to me
Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:30:05 +0400
Alexander Gerasiov g...@cs.msu.su wrote:
Sorry guys. I'm totally busy with other tasks last month :-(. As I
remember your package is quite ready for upload, so I'll do it
tomorrow (without my changes, just add myself as an uploader if you
don't mind). Ok?
As
Hello Alexander!
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:44:48AM +0400, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:30:05 +0400
Alexander Gerasiov g...@cs.msu.su wrote:
Sorry guys. I'm totally busy with other tasks last month :-(. As I
remember your package is quite ready for upload, so I'll do
Hello Alexander, hello *,
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 07:39:51PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 08:02:07PM +0400, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
On Wednesday 15 January 2014 12:40:52 you wrote:
I've notice some progress on the issue:
Sorry guys. I'm totally busy with other tasks last month :-(. As I remember
your package is quite ready for upload, so I'll do it tomorrow (without my
changes, just add myself as an uploader if you don't mind). Ok?
On February 20, 2014 1:52:19 PM Uwe Kleine-König
Hello Alexander,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 05:30:05PM +0400, Alexander Gerasiov wrote:
Sorry guys. I'm totally busy with other tasks last month :-(. As I
remember your package is quite ready for upload, so I'll do it
tomorrow (without my changes, just add myself as an uploader if you
don't
Hello Alexander,
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 08:02:07PM +0400, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
On Wednesday 15 January 2014 12:40:52 you wrote:
I've notice some progress on the issue:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568303
If Alexander won't post anything to this bug,
Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:03:47 +0100
Markus Becker m...@comnets.uni-bremen.de wrote:
On Wednesday 15 January 2014 12:40:52 you wrote:
Hi Markus,
I've notice some progress on the issue:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568303
If Alexander won't post anything to this
Hi Alexander,
there is work in progress to clean up licensing stuff:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.can/4601
slcand is fixed with this patch: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.can/4587
I hope the patches will be committed soon.
It would be great if libsocketcan could be packaged
13 matches
Mail list logo
