Bug#568515: E: unable to schedule circular actions

2010-02-05 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Package: libcupt-perl Version: 1.5.3 Severity: normal Eugene, hi! As we were talking later: === # cupt -t experimental install openoffice.org-core openoffice.org-common W: attempt to set wrong option 'Acquire::http::Pipeline-Depth' W: attempt to set wrong option 'Acquire::http::No-Cache'

Bug#568515: E: unable to schedule circular actions

2010-02-05 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package libcupt-perl openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br openoffice.org-core reassign 568515 openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br,openoffice.org-core retitle 568515 [openoffice.org] mutual conflicts thanks Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: Package: libcupt-perl Version: 1.5.3 Severity: normal Eugene, hi! As we

Bug#568515: E: unable to schedule circular actions

2010-02-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 08:54:51PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: package libcupt-perl openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br openoffice.org-core reassign 568515 openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br,openoffice.org-core retitle 568515 [openoffice.org] mutual conflicts thanks Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:

Bug#568515: E: unable to schedule circular actions

2010-02-05 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: Interestingly, apt does it correctly. (aptitude only in the second suggestion). What does cupt do different than apt and aptitude? Does not try to upgrade packages indirectly (remove, then install) by default. To openoffice.org maintainers: The cause of the bug is

Bug#568515: E: unable to schedule circular actions

2010-02-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:16:06PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: No, no one package manager can upgrade packages in this situation directly, in theory. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560896#74. libapt-based package managers upgrade them indirectly silently, cupt -

Bug#568515: E: unable to schedule circular actions

2010-02-05 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:16:06PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: No, no one package manager can upgrade packages in this situation directly, in theory. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560896#74. libapt-based package managers upgrade them

Bug#568515: E: unable to schedule circular actions

2010-02-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 11:00:11PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: And why does cupt that different? I see no reason to break other packages by changing behaviour there. But anyway... Because silently indirectly upgrading package may silently may silently break package maintainer