Package: libcupt-perl
Version: 1.5.3
Severity: normal
Eugene, hi!
As we were talking later:
===
# cupt -t experimental install openoffice.org-core openoffice.org-common
W: attempt to set wrong option 'Acquire::http::Pipeline-Depth'
W: attempt to set wrong option 'Acquire::http::No-Cache'
package libcupt-perl openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br openoffice.org-core
reassign 568515 openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br,openoffice.org-core
retitle 568515 [openoffice.org] mutual conflicts
thanks
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Package: libcupt-perl
Version: 1.5.3
Severity: normal
Eugene, hi!
As we
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 08:54:51PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
package libcupt-perl openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br openoffice.org-core
reassign 568515 openoffice.org-l10n-pt-br,openoffice.org-core
retitle 568515 [openoffice.org] mutual conflicts
thanks
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Interestingly, apt does it correctly. (aptitude only in the second
suggestion). What does cupt do different than apt and aptitude?
Does not try to upgrade packages indirectly (remove, then install) by default.
To openoffice.org maintainers:
The cause of the bug is
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:16:06PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
No, no one package manager can upgrade packages in this situation directly, in
theory. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560896#74.
libapt-based package managers upgrade them indirectly silently, cupt -
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:16:06PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
No, no one package manager can upgrade packages in this situation directly,
in
theory. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560896#74.
libapt-based package managers upgrade them
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 11:00:11PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
And why does cupt that different? I see no reason to break other
packages by changing behaviour there. But anyway...
Because silently indirectly upgrading package may silently may silently break
package maintainer
7 matches
Mail list logo