Hi Petter!
On 21.03.2010 16:14, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Petter Reinholdtsen]
>> I see the point of only signaling init when the socket changed, but
>> am unsure if we want to look for upstart specific binaries in the
>> generic scripts. Is there still a bug with upstart if this change
>> is
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> I see the point of only signaling init when the socket changed, but
> am unsure if we want to look for upstart specific binaries in the
> generic scripts. Is there still a bug with upstart if this change
> is implemented instead?
I commited and uploaded the change to move
[Michael Biebl]
> There was a bug in my previous patch (a missing '!'), noticed it
> after hitting the send button.
>
> Please find attached an updated patch.
I see the point of only signaling init when the socket changed, but am
unsure if we want to look for upstart specific binaries in the gene
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.87dsf-8
Severity: important
File: /etc/init.d/mountall.sh
Tags: patch
Hi,
mountall.sh contains this code:
#
# We might have mounted something over /dev, see if
# /dev/initctl is there.
#
if [ ! -p $INITCTL ]
then
4 matches
Mail list logo
