# part of the multiarch release goal
severity 569697 important
user multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
usertag 569697 + multiarch
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 04:29:24PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
tag 569697 - patch
so you removed the patch tag and are not actively helping others to
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:53:10AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 04:29:24PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
tag 569697 - patch
so you removed the patch tag and are not actively helping others to
Yes, I've no intention of using it. I was very surprised when I saw it
was tagged
Hi Mark,
Mark Brown broo...@debian.org (07/02/2012):
It really seems entirely irresponsible to just throw stuff in there
without any serious testing and I really want to see a bunch of random
users get multiarch (which pretty much means a multiarch enabled dpkg
in unstable) before doing
There may have been some misunderstanding here? I believe Philipp and
Riku were interpreting this:
This needs to be based on unreleased packaging which isn't anywhere
public yet
as saying you had some semi-finished packaging which you wanted people
to rebase onto, but that they can't do so,
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 08:49:25PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Mark Brown broo...@debian.org (07/02/2012):
It really seems entirely irresponsible to just throw stuff in there
without any serious testing and I really want to see a bunch of random
users get multiarch (which pretty much
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 08:16:06PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
There may have been some misunderstanding here? I believe Philipp and
Riku were interpreting this:
This needs to be based on unreleased packaging which isn't anywhere
public yet
as saying you had some semi-finished packaging
6 matches
Mail list logo
