Bug#570284: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Bug#570284: O: washngo

2010-03-06 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi Marc, Am Samstag, den 27.02.2010, 17:18 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner: Am Donnerstag, den 25.02.2010, 13:27 +0100 schrieb Marc Weber: It compiles even with ghc HEAD with very minimal cabal adjustments. I will upload it to hackage soon. Whether it is a debian package or not isn't

Bug#570284: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Bug#570284: O: washngo

2010-02-27 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 25.02.2010, 13:27 +0100 schrieb Marc Weber: It compiles even with ghc HEAD with very minimal cabal adjustments. I will upload it to hackage soon. Whether it is a debian package or not isn't that important (IMHO). sounds good. I guess if it is really cabalized and

Bug#570284: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Bug#570284: O: washngo

2010-02-25 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 25.02.2010, 10:27 +0100 schrieb Marc Weber: It's a nice piece of code. I'm not using it either. But its ideas should not be forgotten. What exactly is the problem with supporting it? It's not using many extensions so compiling it should not make any trouble, does it?

Bug#570284: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Bug#570284: O: washngo

2010-02-25 Thread Marc Weber
Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Thu Feb 25 10:15:08 +0100 2010: Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 17.02.2010, 15:35 -0600 schrieb John Goerzen: I no longer use WASH, nor do I have time to maintain it anymore. Orphaning it, and CCing debian-haskell in case someone there has interest in it.

Bug#570284: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Bug#570284: O: washngo

2010-02-25 Thread Marc Weber
Hi, It compiles even with ghc HEAD with very minimal cabal adjustments. I will upload it to hackage soon. Whether it is a debian package or not isn't that important (IMHO). Marc Weber -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.