Also discussing the more general issue of selective bootup fsck in
#408954 as of recently.
> Is it ok for you, to create a dummy fsck.ubifs in parallel to
> fsck.nfs?
If we decide to go that way, I think it would be better to modify
the fsck.nfs script to make it generic, and just symlink it for
Hi,
Just some followup on this one ...
Does it not work to specify in /etc/fstab that the file system should
not be checked? If no fsck is available for ubifs, which program is
used to do the fsck-ing? I thought fsck used fsck.$type to do the
actual fsck operation.
This is what I'm
[Ron]
So it is indeed ignoring the fstab option I set for it:
/dev/root / ubifs defaults,noatime,rw 0 0
If so, I suspect this is the same as bug #592427, which have an
untested fix in svn for version 2.88dsf-12 but not uploaded yet.
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.87dsf-8
Severity: normal
checkroot.sh has this comment:
# Disabled AC power check until fsck can be told to only check the
# file system if it is corrupt when running on battery. (bug #526398)
and then it forces rootcheck to 'yes'.
I am running on a
[Bart Trojanowski]
I am running on a SheevaPlug. I installed Debian on a UBIFS
filesystem. This filesystem does not require/have fsck. That
wouldn't be so bad if checkroot.sh didn't forcefully create a
/dev/root and try to fsck it.
Does it not work to specify in /etc/fstab that the file
* Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com [100224 13:02]:
[Bart Trojanowski]
I am running on a SheevaPlug. I installed Debian on a UBIFS
filesystem. This filesystem does not require/have fsck. That
wouldn't be so bad if checkroot.sh didn't forcefully create a
/dev/root and try to fsck it.
6 matches
Mail list logo
