Bug#572966: flexml: should this package be removed?

2010-03-08 Thread Martin Quinson
close 572966 thanks Hey there, You must be kidding, right? This package works just fine and have no bug beside a request for removing someone from uploaders. There's a bunch of requests from lintian about the packaging format, but since the software works just fine (and does so since 3 years),

Bug#572966: flexml: should this package be removed?

2010-03-08 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
Hi again, On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 09:37:55AM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote: You must be kidding, right? No, I'm not. Although I acknowledge what you're saying and of course accept your decision not to remove the package. Note that for this exact reason I didn't send a request to remove it to

Bug#572966: flexml: should this package be removed?

2010-03-08 Thread Martin Quinson
reopen 572966 retitle 572966 Packaging could easily be improved tag 572966 patch severity 572966 minor thanks Hi again, ok. Point taken. I feel ashamed of the easy with which you solved the issues, and I'll try to upload something solving these issues. Reopening the bug to not loose the

Bug#572966: flexml: should this package be removed?

2010-03-08 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 02:21:26PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote: ok. Point taken. I feel ashamed of the easy with which you solved the issues, and I'll try to upload something solving these issues. Reopening the bug to not loose the discussion patch. No need to worry, really! Thanks for this

Bug#572966: flexml: should this package be removed?

2010-03-07 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
Package: flexml Version: 1.8-1 Severity: serious Tags: squeeze sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-removal Dear Maintainers, while reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * you all are MIA, right? *