On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 17:09 +0200, Андрей Василишин wrote:
Why can't you understand that:
- squeeze is going to use 2.6.32
- experimental is experimental
- aufs is a dirty hack and will keep on breaking
Why is aufs a dirty hack?
Because the Linux VFS doesn't (yet) provide the
Why can't you understand that:
- squeeze is going to use 2.6.32
- experimental is experimental
- aufs is a dirty hack and will keep on breaking
Why is aufs a dirty hack?
I am using it for merging many HDDs in a big storage. I tested mhddfs
(http://svn.uvw.ru/mhddfs/trunk/README) and it very
15.02.2011 17:15, Ben Hutchings пишет:
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 17:09 +0200, Андрей Василишин wrote:
Why can't you understand that:
- squeeze is going to use 2.6.32
- experimental is experimental
- aufs is a dirty hack and will keep on breaking
Why is aufs a dirty hack?
Because the
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 06:27:44PM +0200, Андрей Василишин wrote:
[...]
mhddfs uses FUSE and if Valerie Aurora make the same it like
reinvent the wheel.
In any case, I am ready to become a beta-tester for new filesystem.
Valerie has proposed changes to the VFS to make 'union mounts' work.
unarchive 573189
reopen 573189
found 553472 2.6.34-1~experimental.2
thanks
...and the story of being ignored apparently continues :(
---snip---
r15628 | maks | 2010-05-05 23:44:47 +0200 (Wed, 05 May 2010) | 4 lines
sync to 2.6.34-rc6
disabled arm feature patches, nuked merged stuff, disabled
ressign 573189 linux-image-2.6
found 553472 2.6.34-1~experimental.2
thanks
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 17:59 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
unarchive 573189
reopen 573189
found 553472 2.6.34-1~experimental.2
thanks
...and the story of being ignored apparently continues :(
---snip---
r15628 | maks | 2010-05-05 23:44:47 +0200 (Wed, 05 May 2010) | 4 lines
sync to
Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 06:09:07PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.33-2-686
Version: 2.6.33-1~experimental.2
Severity: normal
In 2.3.33 aufs does not work and it is not mentioned in the config file,
not even as disabled.
This means debian-live
severity 573189 important
thanks
Hi,
as we discussed last time, unionfs-fuse is not acceptable.
until unionmount is available in upstream, the debian kernels need to
have aufs2.
either, the kernel team is going to keep applying the aufs2 patches for
the kernel =2.6.32, or, we need aufs oot
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 15:12 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
severity 573189 important
thanks
Hi,
as we discussed last time, unionfs-fuse is not acceptable.
until unionmount is available in upstream, the debian kernels need to
have aufs2.
either, the kernel team is going to keep
Package: linux-image-2.6.33-2-686
Version: 2.6.33-1~experimental.2
Severity: normal
In 2.3.33 aufs does not work and it is not mentioned in the config file,
not even as disabled.
This means debian-live cannot boot from 2.6.33.
This is a regression since 2.6.32 which included in-kernel aufs.
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 06:09:07PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.33-2-686
Version: 2.6.33-1~experimental.2
Severity: normal
In 2.3.33 aufs does not work and it is not mentioned in the config file,
not even as disabled.
This means debian-live cannot boot from
12 matches
Mail list logo
