On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 11:55:06AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I think, and have for some time, that the ideal situation would be a
maintenance team that includes Matthias (assuming that Matthias still
cares deeply about the Python packaging and wants to continue to
participate). If such a
Stefano Zacchiroli writes (Bug#573745: ping):
Let's assume for a moment (very hypothetically!) that a team can be
found which both includes the current maintainer and has rough consensus
on -python. Would the CTTE be willing to establish such a team as
Python interpreter maintainers, even
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 22:58, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
I would vote against this.
can you swear your NACK is completely unrelated to the fact you're a
collegue of Matthias in
Canonical/Linaro/whatever-umbrella-company-is-now? What I think it's
important, is to understand if, and
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 22:58, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
I would vote against this.
can you swear your NACK is completely unrelated to the fact you're a
collegue of Matthias in
Canonical/Linaro/whatever-umbrella-company-is-now? What I think
Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org writes:
Wow. Almost nobody uses python-central because python-support has a
friendly maintainer that helps people asking questions. Reversing the
situation seems quite biaised. For example, python-central does not
clean up old pyc files and there are
Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org writes:
If the CTTE agrees, I will proceed as follow. I will propose, at my
discretion, a maintenance team that I hope could be accepted by all
involved parties. I'll ask for extra volunteers and for (motivated)
objections, trying to mediate in the
Sandro,
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 12:18:46PM +, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 22:58, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
I would vote against this.
can you swear your NACK is completely unrelated to the fact you're a
collegue of Matthias in
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:57:17AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
As ~2 more months have passed without a comment, I can't do any better
than pinging the CTTE again, AOL-ing the text above (especially the last
paragraph).
As the decision is fully in the hands of the CTTE, I don't see any
Stefano Zacchiroli writes (Bug#573745: ping):
2 more months have passed, ... time for another ping :-)
I have to say I'm very disappointed that we haven't managed to do a
better job of this. We need to find a way to make this decision which
does not become irretrievably blocked.
AIUI
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:33:27AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
AIUI at the moment the blocking problem is that we don't have a
suitable new team. The selection of the new team is not something the
ctte is any good at, and selecting maintainers by private email
exchanges is bad anyway because
Hi Don others,
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 05:58, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:16:32PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
All that said, one of the few remaining actions I can take on this
issue is to friendly ping
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:16:32PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
All that said, one of the few remaining actions I can take on this
issue is to friendly ping the tech-ctte to actually decide on this
issue, open for 7 months now. I do think
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:16:32PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
All that said, one of the few remaining actions I can take on this
issue is to friendly ping the tech-ctte to actually decide on this
issue, open for 7 months now. I do think tech-ctte is a very useful
device in Debian and I
Dear Technical Committee members,
as you might imagine I got asked fairly often what is the status of
this issue. I've always made clear that any issue brought to the
tech-ctte is no DPL matter; the Constitution is very clear about that.
The only thing I could have done to help out a bit is
14 matches
Mail list logo
