* Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net>, 2011-09-01, 16:21:
+Tag: package-contains-no-arch-dependent-files +Severity: important +Certainty: certain +Info: The package is not marked architecture all, but all the files it + ships are installed in /usr/share. + . + Most likely this package should be marked architecture all, but there + is a chance that the package is missing files. +Ref: policy 5.6.8
I disagree both with severity and certainty. First of all, as far as I can tell there's nothing in the policy that would prohibit arch:any package with arch-independent contents. Secondly, there are valid uses cases for arch-specific packages with files only in /usr/share (think of arch-specific Depends line).
In my opinion this should be at most minor/possible.
+override_dh_auto_install: + for P in $$(dh_listpackages) ; do \ + dh_install -p$$P some-file usr/lib/$$P ; \ + done
"set -e" is missing here (as per Policy 4.6). -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
