Bug#575087: bug 575087 : On a default installation wbar will fail due dot.wbar

2012-10-16 Thread Markus Koschany
severity 575087 important thanks As i have announced before, i'm changing the severity to important again. The reasons are in short: * Wbar is usable out-of-the-box, if you install it with Recommends * Wbar is usable if you install it without Recommends but then it needs configuration which

Bug#575087: bug 575087 : On a default installation wbar will fail due dot.wbar

2012-10-16 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:43:39 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: Due to the many code changes in 2.3.4 it is too late to consider it at this point of the freeze for Wheezy. But i'm willing to backport new versions to Wheezy if someone is interested in it. Sounds like a good plan, thanks for this

Bug#575087: bug 575087 : On a default installation wbar will fail due dot.wbar

2012-10-13 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Markus and Gregor, On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:26:19AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:08:49 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: I'm in favor of downgrading this bug to important again but i would like to hear Barts opinion first. Right, I'm also looking forward to hear

Bug#575087: bug 575087 : On a default installation wbar will fail due dot.wbar

2012-10-13 Thread Markus Koschany
On Sat, 13. Oct 06:08 Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: Hi Bart, My opinion is based on how I understand Depends and Recommends in debian-policy. The package should work, providing at least some basic funcionality, without the software in Recommends. I think this bug highlights why we

Bug#575087: bug 575087 : On a default installation wbar will fail due dot.wbar

2012-10-13 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 06:08:01 +, Bart Martens wrote: Hi Markus and Gregor, Hi Bart, Thank you both for for asking my point of view. My opinion was hidden here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=14;bug=575087 | The merged bugs 575087 and 599083 describe multiple