Arto Jantunen writes:
> For bcfg2 that is the case, but bcfg2-server gets the conditional
> depends and lintian warns. Interresting that those are different,
> btw.
Doh. I'm remarkably blind this morning.
> Hmm. I need to figure out why the two packages from the same source
> get different re
Russ Allbery writes:
> Arto Jantunen writes:
>
>> Python-support generates python (>= 2.6) | python2.6 for this case
>> (which is partially broken since the scripts get /usr/bin/python2.6
>> which wouldn't be provided by 2.7 etc), maybe that is different from
>> just depending on 2.6?
>
> Ah, ye
Arto Jantunen writes:
> Python-support generates python (>= 2.6) | python2.6 for this case
> (which is partially broken since the scripts get /usr/bin/python2.6
> which wouldn't be provided by 2.7 etc), maybe that is different from
> just depending on 2.6?
Ah, yes. Lintian would correctly diagn
Russ Allbery writes:
> Arto Jantunen writes:
>> That package isn't yet in the archive, but as I see it any
>> python-support using package should do for a test case. Just set
>> debian/pyversions to 2.6-, build-dep on python2.6, Depend on
>> ${python:Depends} and this happens.
>
> I can't duplic
Arto Jantunen writes:
> I'm positive:
> vi...@tsunami:~/debian/work$ lintian --version
> Lintian v2.3.4
> vi...@tsunami:~/debian/work$ lintian bcfg2_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes
> W: bcfg2-server: binary-without-manpage usr/sbin/bcfg2-ping-sweep
> W: bcfg2-server: binary-without-manpage usr/sbin/bcfg2
Russ Allbery writes:
> Arto Jantunen writes:
>
>> Package: lintian
>> Version: 2.3.4
>> Severity: normal
>
>> False positives as described in the subject. Possibly 2.6 is missing
>> from the regexp used by this check?
>
> Are you positive you're using 2.3.4? I added 2.6 in that version.
I'm po
Arto Jantunen writes:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.3.4
> Severity: normal
> False positives as described in the subject. Possibly 2.6 is missing
> from the regexp used by this check?
Are you positive you're using 2.3.4? I added 2.6 in that version.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)
Package: lintian
Version: 2.3.4
Severity: normal
False positives as described in the subject. Possibly 2.6 is missing from the
regexp used by this check?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture:
8 matches
Mail list logo