Wilmer van der Gaast wrote:
> I just also found http://www.alien.net.au/irc/irc2numerics.html which
> seems like a great source for info like this; better than anything else
> I found so far.
>
> Looks like 320 is more suitable for this and is abused by various
> clients for showing misc. informat
I just also found http://www.alien.net.au/irc/irc2numerics.html which
seems like a great source for info like this; better than anything else
I found so far.
Looks like 320 is more suitable for this and is abused by various
clients for showing misc. information in /WHOIS replies already. I'll
swit
Sigh. I could've known. :-(
I spent a little while trying to pick a suitable number that isn't in
use already, but 333 is definitely in use already for /topic, yeah.
Bd choice, even though irssi let me get away with it.
This is definitely BitlBee's fault. I should find another int to use.
IRC
Package: bitlbee
Version: 1.2.5-1
Severity: normal
I got the error below when connecting rcirc (part of GNU Emacs) to
bitlbee, which was speaking XMPP to an internal server (running
ejabberd, I believe). rcirc's developer, rcy, believes bitlbee is at
fault. Please investigate.
I just got this
4 matches
Mail list logo
