Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93.4
Severity: normal
mkinitramfs needs mktemp, but initramfs-tools doesn't have a dependency
on mktemp or coreutils =7.4-1. mktemp is no longer a Priority:
required package. As a result of this I get the following problem.
palf...@missfun:[~] sudo dpkg -a
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 03:32:28PM +0100, Tom Parker wrote:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93.4
Severity: normal
mkinitramfs needs mktemp, but initramfs-tools doesn't have a dependency
on mktemp or coreutils =7.4-1. mktemp is no longer a Priority:
required package. As a result of this
On 26/04/10 15:32, maximilian attems wrote:
coreutils is priority required, your box looks broken.
please investigate how it came to missing mktemp.
thanks
There was an installed copy of coreutils, but version 6.10-6 which
doesn't contain mktemp. The issue is partly because this is a mixed
On 2010-04-26 16:45 +0200, Tom Parker wrote:
On 26/04/10 15:32, maximilian attems wrote:
coreutils is priority required, your box looks broken.
please investigate how it came to missing mktemp.
thanks
There was an installed copy of coreutils, but version 6.10-6 which
doesn't contain
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 03:45:40PM +0100, Tom Parker wrote:
On 26/04/10 15:32, maximilian attems wrote:
coreutils is priority required, your box looks broken.
please investigate how it came to missing mktemp.
thanks
There was an installed copy of coreutils, but version 6.10-6 which
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:32:42PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 03:32:28PM +0100, Tom Parker wrote:
mkinitramfs needs mktemp, but initramfs-tools doesn't have a dependency
on mktemp or coreutils =7.4-1. mktemp is no longer a Priority:
required package. As a result
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 20:15 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:32:42PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 03:32:28PM +0100, Tom Parker wrote:
mkinitramfs needs mktemp, but initramfs-tools doesn't have a dependency
on mktemp or coreutils =7.4-1.
7 matches
Mail list logo
