Bug#584101: inotail: As coreutils in sid and squeeze supports inotify, this package should be removed from sid

Hi, On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:24:56PM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote: > Fair enough. I filed an RM bug for inotail in #804803. Thanks for your work on this package. Iain. P.S. I noticed you also maintain cscope and netsniff-ng. I use these packages in my work so if you're ever short of a sponsor

Bug#584101: inotail: As coreutils in sid and squeeze supports inotify, this package should be removed from sid

tags -wontfix thanks On 2015-11-07 at 19:24:13 +0100, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:49:49 +0200 Tobias Klauser wrote: > > There are still around 450 users of inotail according to popcon and I > > still know of several users who

Bug#584101: inotail: As coreutils in sid and squeeze supports inotify, this package should be removed from sid

Hi, On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:49:49 +0200 Tobias Klauser wrote: > There are still around 450 users of inotail according to popcon and I > still know of several users who are using inotail on a regular basis. So > I'd rather keep it around for a bit. There are only 290

Bug#584101: inotail: As coreutils in sid and squeeze supports inotify, this package should be removed from sid

Package: inotail Version: 0.5-2 Severity: normal I used this for quite a while, but coreutils support inotify now (I actually reported it to the coreutils mailing list). I think this package should be removed from sid, as it is no longer useful. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.4

Bug#584101: inotail: As coreutils in sid and squeeze supports inotify, this package should be removed from sid

tags 584101 wontfix thanks On 2010-06-01 at 11:24:07 +0200, scientes scientes-b...@jengr.com wrote: Package: inotail Version: 0.5-2 Severity: normal I used this for quite a while, but coreutils support inotify now (I actually reported it to the coreutils mailing list). I think this