Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:27:12PM +0200, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
On 06/06/2010 14.55, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 02:17:29PM +0200, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
On 06/06/2010 13.21, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 08:47:23AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:27:12PM +0200, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
On 06/06/2010 14.55, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 02:17:29PM +0200, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
On 06/06/2010 13.21,
severity 584748 important
clone 584748 -1
reassign -1 valgrind
retitle -1 valgrind: load i686 libraries while emulating an i586 CPU
thanks
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 12:16:00PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 08:47:23AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
Package: libc6-i686
Version: 2.11.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
I'm unable to run valgrind without renaming /lib/i686
it asserts on:
.../sysdeps/x86_64/cacheinfo.c:255: handle_intel: Assertion `maxidx = 2'
I've looked at sources and is_intel is true but my cpu is
processor : 0
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:40:26AM +0200, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
Package: libc6-i686
Version: 2.11.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
I'm unable to run valgrind without renaming /lib/i686
it asserts on:
.../sysdeps/x86_64/cacheinfo.c:255: handle_intel: Assertion `maxidx = 2'
I've
On 06/06/2010 13.21, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
This part is not consistent. Are you running reportbug on a different
machine?
yes
the problem is on a old amd 800mhz box, but I use a different box
for submitting
do you need some additional
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 02:17:29PM +0200, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
On 06/06/2010 13.21, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
This part is not consistent. Are you running reportbug on a different
machine?
yes
the problem is on a old amd 800mhz
On 06/06/2010 14.55, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 02:17:29PM +0200, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
On 06/06/2010 13.21, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
This part is not consistent. Are you running reportbug on a different
machine?
yes
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:27:12PM +0200, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
On 06/06/2010 14.55, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 02:17:29PM +0200, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
On 06/06/2010 13.21, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
This part is not
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:03:15PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Unfortunately I am not able to reproduce it. Tried on an Athlon and on
Opteron CPU.
I am just wondering, what is the version of valgrind, and how exactly do
you trigger the bug (valgrind command line, code, etc.)
--
Aurelien
On 06/06/2010 23.09, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:03:15PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Unfortunately I am not able to reproduce it. Tried on an Athlon and on
Opteron CPU.
I am just wondering, what is the version of valgrind, and how exactly do
you trigger the bug
On 06/06/2010 23.09, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:03:15PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Unfortunately I am not able to reproduce it. Tried on an Athlon and on
Opteron CPU.
I am just wondering, what is the version of valgrind, and how exactly do
you trigger the bug
12 matches
Mail list logo
