Bug#585625: linux-image-2.6 2.6.32-19 works for me

2010-08-17 Thread Michael Shuler
On 08/16/2010 09:49 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: Is i915 also working for you in this version? Yes, i915 started working correctly for me with 2.6.32-19 (currently using 2.6.32-20 with i915 successfully). Andrew pointed me to this bug at DebConf10 - I had just purchased a ThinkPad X201, installed

Bug#585625: linux-image-2.6 2.6.32-19 works for me

2010-08-17 Thread Bastian Blank
found 585625 2.6.32-20 thanks On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 03:49:08AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 12:42 -0500, Michael Shuler wrote: I am tracking Squeeze and yesterday installed linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem version 2.6.32-19 from Sid on a Lenovo ThinkPad X201 with the

Bug#585625: linux-image-2.6 2.6.32-19 works for me

2010-08-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 12:42 -0500, Michael Shuler wrote: I am tracking Squeeze and yesterday installed linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem version 2.6.32-19 from Sid on a Lenovo ThinkPad X201 with the identical video chipset as listed by Andrew in #585910 - so far, version 2.6.32-19 is working

Bug#585625: linux-image-2.6 2.6.32-19 works for me

2010-08-12 Thread Michael Shuler
I am tracking Squeeze and yesterday installed linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem version 2.6.32-19 from Sid on a Lenovo ThinkPad X201 with the identical video chipset as listed by Andrew in #585910 - so far, version 2.6.32-19 is working well for me and I thought I would pass along my success. --