On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:55:52PM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
After upgrading from libc6-dev 2.10.2-9 to 2.11.1-3, executables built
with libc6-dev segfault on startup. gdb says that the segfault happens
in string functions such as strrchr or strlen. The executables build
without error.
Are
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 05:59:03AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:55:52PM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
After upgrading from libc6-dev 2.10.2-9 to 2.11.1-3, executables built
with libc6-dev segfault on startup. gdb says that the segfault happens
in string functions such
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:51:49AM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
That would happen to be 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7.
Sorry, that would be *binutils* 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7. binutils-gold is
not installed.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:54:36AM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
Sorry, that would be *binutils* 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7. binutils-gold is
not installed.
binutils from stable does not work with libc6-dev = 2.11
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 03:06:30PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:54:36AM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
Sorry, that would be *binutils* 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7. binutils-gold is
not installed.
binutils from stable does not work with libc6-dev = 2.11
Currently the package
forcemerge 585937 586388
thanks
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 02:25:54PM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 03:06:30PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:54:36AM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
Sorry, that would be *binutils* 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7. binutils-gold is
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.11.1-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
After upgrading from libc6-dev 2.10.2-9 to 2.11.1-3, executables built
with libc6-dev segfault on startup. gdb says that the segfault happens
in string functions such as strrchr or strlen. The
7 matches
Mail list logo
