On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 21:03 +0100, Niccolò Belli wrote:
Il 08/03/2012 18:47, Ian Campbell ha scritto:
There was a breakage of the blktap userspace- kernel ABI at one
point, which might stop 4.1 working with 2.6.32 era kernel wihch might
also explain this.
That may be the problem indeed,
Il 14/03/2012 14:34, Ian Campbell ha scritto:
I should have asked -- what exactly didn't work, what was the failure
mode? (I'm wondering if my thoughts about this compatibility issue I
mentioned above might have been jumping to a conclusion without
sufficient data?)
As soon as you load the
Il 08/03/2012 18:47, Ian Campbell ha scritto:
There was a breakage of the blktap userspace- kernel ABI at one
point, which might stop 4.1 working with 2.6.32 era kernel wihch might
also explain this.
That may be the problem indeed, the only reason Squeeze didn't get
blktap2 was a stupid
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 11:19 +0100, Niccolò Belli wrote:
Forget about blktap2 in Squeeze... Unfortunately it doesn't work even
backporting 4.1.2-3.
There is no kernel side in Squeeze so backporting the userspace side
will not work.
You could try backporting the blktap-dkms stuff from
Uh? Really? I'm pretty sure blktap2 did work with upstream
xen-4.0-rc$something (not the debian packages) and the official
(pre-)Squeeze 2.6.32 xen kernel.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
There is no kernel side in Squeeze so backporting the userspace side
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 18:44 +0100, Niccolò Belli wrote:
Uh? Really? I'm pretty sure blktap2 did work with upstream
xen-4.0-rc$something (not the debian packages) and the official
(pre-)Squeeze 2.6.32 xen kernel.
Hmm. Perhaps I'm confused then.
There was a breakage of the blktap userspace -
6 matches
Mail list logo
