Bug#587967: gnash: unbuildable in sid, depends on removed boost1.40

2010-08-05 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
[ adding #575089, the memory leak bug, to cc ] Hi! * Miriam Ruiz little_m...@yahoo.es [100805 02:01]: [..] As a newer version is about to be released, and hoping that it fixes the memory leak, I'll wait a couple of weeks and upload it. A couple of weeks is quite a lot of time before a

Bug#575089: Bug#587967: gnash: unbuildable in sid, depends on removed boost1.40

2010-08-05 Thread Miriam Ruiz
--- El jue, 5/8/10, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org escribió: * Miriam Ruiz little_m...@yahoo.es [100805 02:01]: [..] As a newer version is about to be released, and hoping that it fixes the memory leak, I'll wait a couple of weeks and upload it. A couple of weeks is

Bug#575089: Bug#587967: gnash: unbuildable in sid, depends on removed boost1.40

2010-08-05 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! * Miriam Ruiz little_m...@yahoo.es [100805 11:50]: A couple of weeks is quite a lot of time before a hopefully soon freeze. Would you please consider to upload to experimental soonish (as upstreams work permits to do so), so it can be tested, if the memory leak got closed?

Bug#587967: gnash: unbuildable in sid, depends on removed boost1.40

2010-08-04 Thread Miriam Ruiz
--- El sáb, 17/7/10, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org escribió: Some hours later the build finished, and the results look reasonable to me. I'm attaching the debdiff. Miry, just shout if you want me to upload. Sorry for the delay, I'm seriously overloaded these days. I've uploaded a

Bug#587967: gnash: unbuildable in sid, depends on removed boost1.40

2010-07-26 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 14:56:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: If it helps I can upload the package I built last week, with the debdiff I sent to #587967. I'm slightly torn, to be honest. Uploading your new package would at least allow us to have a package in squeeze that's buildable. On the

Bug#587967: gnash: unbuildable in sid, depends on removed boost1.40

2010-07-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 17:29 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:20:38 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: we may end up with a choice of temporarily breaking gnash in testing or removing it if icu is otherwise ready to go and gnash isn't, or at least isn't on all

Bug#587967: gnash: unbuildable in sid, depends on removed boost1.40

2010-07-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 19:30 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 15:05 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:37:53 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: Cheers, gregor, trying to build this beast right now Some hours later the build finished, and the results

Bug#587967: gnash: unbuildable in sid, depends on removed boost1.40

2010-07-24 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:20:38 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: I've binNMUed gnash on amd64 to check whether it will actually build by virtue of the libboost-dev final fallback build-dep. Even if that works, It didn't, as sbuild just tried to install libboost1.40-dev anyway... That would

Bug#587967: gnash: unbuildable in sid, depends on removed boost1.40

2010-07-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 15:05 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:37:53 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: Cheers, gregor, trying to build this beast right now Some hours later the build finished, and the results look reasonable to me. I'm attaching the debdiff. Miry, just

Bug#587967: gnash: unbuildable in sid, depends on removed boost1.40

2010-07-17 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:50:44 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: diff -u gnash-0.8.7/debian/control gnash-0.8.7/debian/control --- gnash-0.8.7/debian/control +++ gnash-0.8.7/debian/control @@ -7,12 +7,10 @@ libltdl3-dev, libxmu-dev, dejagnu, autotools-dev, libjpeg-dev, libpng12-dev |

Bug#587967: gnash: unbuildable in sid, depends on removed boost1.40

2010-07-17 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:37:53 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: Cheers, gregor, trying to build this beast right now Some hours later the build finished, and the results look reasonable to me. I'm attaching the debdiff. Miry, just shout if you want me to upload. Cheers, gregor -- .''`.

Bug#587967: gnash: unbuildable in sid, depends on removed boost1.40

2010-07-13 Thread Miriam Ruiz
Thanks, I'll try to solve this ASAP. I've just been extremely busy this weeks -and still are- at work. Greetings, Miry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#587967: gnash: unbuildable in sid, depends on removed boost1.40

2010-07-12 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
the unversioned packages all depend on the corresponding versioned package, so it seems best to leave the versioned packages out of build-depends entirely: diff -u gnash-0.8.7/debian/control gnash-0.8.7/debian/control --- gnash-0.8.7/debian/control +++ gnash-0.8.7/debian/control @@ -7,12 +7,10 @@

Bug#587967: gnash: unbuildable in sid, depends on removed boost1.40

2010-07-08 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp, 2010-07-04, 22:35: + ibboost-date-time1.42-dev | libboost-date-time1.40-dev | libboost-date-time1.39-dev | I see a typo here. BTW, those alternative build-dependencies are insane, we should get rid of them, rather than add new ones. -- Jakub Wilk

Bug#587967: gnash: unbuildable in sid, depends on removed boost1.40

2010-07-04 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, As attached patch, it seems to be easy to fix. I can build it on i386 pbuilder. Please update it to solve RC bug, thanks. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane diff -u gnash-0.8.7/debian/changelog gnash-0.8.7/debian/changelog

Bug#587967: gnash: unbuildable in sid, depends on removed boost1.40

2010-07-03 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: gnash Version: 0.8.7-2 Severity: serious gnash in sid and testing build-depends on boost 1.40, which has been removed from the archive. Please update your build dependencies. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature