Bug#588312: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#588312: logcheck-database: updated rules for many packages

2024-04-27 Thread Richard Lewis
Closing this bug from 2010 (14 years ago!) -- the then-maintainer found that most of the suggestions were either already present or should not actually be added, for various reasons. A requested was made to resubmit as more independent bugs - if that was done, we dont need this bug, and if not

Bug#588312: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#588312: logcheck-database: updated rules for many packages

2010-07-08 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Hi, Like Gerfried said, please file different bug reports for different packages the next time. Some comments about your rule suggestions: Radosław Antoniuk wrote: #dkimproxy ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dkimproxy.out\[[0-9]+\]: connect from .*$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+

Bug#588312: logcheck-database: updated rules for many packages

2010-07-07 Thread Radek Antoniuk
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.10 Severity: normal Please add rules for some packages: #dkimproxy ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dkimproxy.out\[[0-9]+\]: connect from .*$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dkimproxy.out\[[0-9]+\]: DKIM signing - signed; .*$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11}

Bug#588312: logcheck-database: updated rules for many packages

2010-07-07 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
tags 588312 + moreinfo severity 588312 wishlist thanks Hello! * Radek Antoniuk radek.anton...@gmail.com [2010-07-07 11:44:43 CEST]: Please add rules for some packages: It would be highly convenient if you could offer some sample log entries so we can check if your usage of wildchar .*

Bug#588312: logcheck-database: updated rules for many packages

2010-07-07 Thread Radosław Antoniuk
#dkimproxy ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dkimproxy.out\[[0-9]+\]: connect from .*$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dkimproxy.out\[[0-9]+\]: DKIM signing - signed; .*$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dkimproxy.out\[[0-9]+\]: DKIM signing - skipped; .*$ No rules at all. Jul 7