Bug#589763: related ?

2010-11-02 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 16:03 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:24:32 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Hi Sylvestre, Sorry, didn't see this note until now. You're probably right, that should be the cause. This confirms that a binNMU of scalapack should fix this

Bug#589763: related ?

2010-11-01 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi Sylvestre, Sorry, didn't see this note until now. You're probably right, that should be the cause. This confirms that a binNMU of scalapack should fix this bug (should have subscribed to it). The maintainer hasn't replied, so can the release team take care of this before squeeze? It's

Bug#589763: related ?

2010-11-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:24:32 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Hi Sylvestre, Sorry, didn't see this note until now. You're probably right, that should be the cause. This confirms that a binNMU of scalapack should fix this bug (should have subscribed to it). The maintainer hasn't

Bug#589763: related ?

2010-08-04 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
I wonder if it is not caused by: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588175 scalapack-1.8.0/debian$ grep lapack-dev control Build-Depends: mpi-default-dev, pvm-dev, blacs-pvm-dev, gfortran, liblapack-dev, libblas-dev, debhelper (= 6), libblacs-mpi-dev Sylvestre -- To