Bug#592515: future unblock: nama/1.064-1 (or -2)

2010-08-20 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 08/20/2010 03:04 AM, Joel Roth wrote: 1) Fix the problem upstream (easy, as I am the upstream author) and svn-upgrade to a new major version. 2) Provide a patch for the current release and bump the Debian version suffix. The second option is enough to fix the problem. Please update

Bug#592515: future unblock: nama/1.064-1 (or -2)

2010-08-20 Thread Joel Roth
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 08:10:18AM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 08/20/2010 03:04 AM, Joel Roth wrote: 1) Fix the problem upstream (easy, as I am the upstream author) and svn-upgrade to a new major version. 2) Provide a patch for the current release and bump the Debian version

Bug#592515: future unblock: nama/1.064-1 (or -2)

2010-08-19 Thread Joel Roth
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 06:28:42PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 08/15/2010 06:08 PM, Tim Retout wrote: I've uploaded this. Unblocked. Cheers, Another issue has come up with version 1.064-2 of this package, which you recently unblocked. I've found that the TEXT COMMANDS section

Bug#592515: future unblock: nama/1.064-1 (or -2)

2010-08-15 Thread Tim Retout
010 21:04, Joel Roth jo...@pobox.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 05:13:44AM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On  0, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org wrote: I see two possible solutions to include the RC bug fix in Squeeze: a) Allow both nama/1.064-1 and the (new) libaudio-ecasound-perl to

Bug#592515: future unblock: nama/1.064-1 (or -2)

2010-08-15 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 08/15/2010 06:08 PM, Tim Retout wrote: I've uploaded this. Unblocked. Cheers, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#592515: future unblock: nama/1.064-1 (or -2)

2010-08-12 Thread Joel Roth
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 05:13:44AM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 0, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org wrote: I see two possible solutions to include the RC bug fix in Squeeze: a) Allow both nama/1.064-1 and the (new) libaudio-ecasound-perl to migrate to testing. However I guess the

Bug#592515: future unblock: nama/1.064-1 (or -2)

2010-08-11 Thread Joel Roth
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 05:13:44AM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 0, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org wrote: I see two possible solutions to include the RC bug fix in Squeeze: a) Allow both nama/1.064-1 and the (new) libaudio-ecasound-perl to migrate to testing. However I guess the

Bug#592515: future unblock: nama/1.064-1 (or -2)

2010-08-10 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I just noticed that a new version of nama has been uploaded before 1.063-1 migrated to testing to fix a FTBFS. On the good side the new upstream release is just a small bug fix so it

Bug#592515: future unblock: nama/1.064-1 (or -2)

2010-08-10 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 0, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org wrote: I see two possible solutions to include the RC bug fix in Squeeze: a) Allow both nama/1.064-1 and the (new) libaudio-ecasound-perl to migrate to testing. However I guess the release team is not happy about including new packages at this point.