Le mardi 14 septembre 2010 à 23:38 +0200, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
Why do you need to compress the kernel? It should be a zImage or
LZMA-image already anywhere.
Yeah, I know, that's a bit tricky (I commented it on the d-i target, but
I haven't sent it yet).
So, U-Boot have an
* Thibaut Girka t...@sitedethib.com [2010-08-31 23:43]:
If you're talking about the discussion in #503292, then yes, s3c24xx was
decided.
Ok, that's fine then.
There is already basic (really basic, no display or even µSD) support in
mainline kernel, and the name is GTA02.
Ok.
Why do you
* Thibaut GIRKA t...@sitedethib.com [2010-08-16 16:15]:
-XB-Subarchitecture: iop32x ixp4xx kirkwood orion5x
+XB-Subarchitecture: iop32x ixp4xx kirkwood orion5x s3c24xx
Is s3c24xx what was decided in the end? I remember there was a lot of
discussion of s3c vs s3c24xx but I cannot remember the
Le mardi 31 août 2010 à 22:29 +0100, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
* Thibaut GIRKA t...@sitedethib.com [2010-08-16 16:15]:
-XB-Subarchitecture: iop32x ixp4xx kirkwood orion5x
+XB-Subarchitecture: iop32x ixp4xx kirkwood orion5x s3c24xx
Is s3c24xx what was decided in the end? I remember there
Package: flash-kernel-installer
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please add support for the gta02.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (120, 'unstable'), (105, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux
5 matches
Mail list logo
