On Mi, 25 Mai 2011, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> You did ask and I answered correct. So if you do not want answers, do
> not ask!
Please see my post from 2010-08-27 on the bug report.
Then tell me where you have answered any of the quetions posed in the
thread.
End of line.
> Ps. Don't bother to go on
On 25.05.11 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
> On Mi, 25 Mai 2011, Klaus Ethgen wrote
Hi,
> > Forgot to answer to the bt too...
>
> Not again this thread.
>
> By now about 20 emails and still no terminal log.
>
> I think the history of this bug has been explained in detail by
> myse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Mi den 25. Mai 2011 um 13:33 schrieb Norbert Preining:
> tag 593706 +invalid +ignore +rubbish +forget +idontcare
[...]
> > Forgot to answer to the bt too...
>
> Not again this thread.
>
> By now about 20 emails and still no terminal log.
What a
tag 593706 +invalid +ignore +rubbish +forget +idontcare
thanks
On Mi, 25 Mai 2011, Klaus Ethgen wrote
> Forgot to answer to the bt too...
Not again this thread.
By now about 20 emails and still no terminal log.
I think the history of this bug has been explained in detail by
myself in my email f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Forgot to answer to the bt too...
- - Forwarded message from Klaus Ethgen -
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 06:40:16 +0100
From: Klaus Ethgen
To: Hilmar Preusse
Subject: Re: Bug#593706: install-info breaks dpkg
Hello,
Am So den 22. Mai 2011 um
On 20.08.10 Klaus Ethgen (kl...@ethgen.de) wrote:
Hi Klaus,
> The tool /usr/bin/install-info breaks the configuration in dpkg as
> dpkg uses install-info internal (dpkg, debconf, dpkg-reconfigure, I
> am not sure which exactly but that makes no sens either). The
> configuration on newly installe
On 26.08.10 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
Hi,
> Please, either do what you have been asked for several times, or
> leave us alone, or go to the technical committee. But don't waste
> our time.
>
Full ACK. Please stop explaining to Klaus, that we wrote an
incomplete bug report. It
On Do, 26 Aug 2010, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> might be that that was organized together. But as it is at least broken
> in some cases shows that not all cases are addressed.
Yes, but you might check the definition of
> That is definitely not true. I got a mail of one people who had the same
> problem
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 05:33:38PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> I will provide the Informations you asked here the next days. Please
> give me some time to setup a test bed for it.
As much time as you need; once we are able to reproduce it following
your instructions, it will be possible to reasse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello together,
Am Do den 26. Aug 2010 um 11:51 schrieb Norbert Preining:
> On Do, 26 Aug 2010, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > Aha, if it breaks unrelated software and the whole system it is only
> > normal priority.
> >
> > Debian quality gets more and m
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:32:49AM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> As least one other people did see the same problem. So that is not a
> notexisting problem. That is a real problem that is reproducible as I
> wrote in the bug report.
Which other people?
> However, it is understandable that you need
On Do, 26 Aug 2010, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Aha, if it breaks unrelated software and the whole system it is only
> normal priority.
>
> Debian quality gets more and more worse in my opinion. To lower high
> important severities is not helping to hold high quality.
The move to install-info from GNU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Mi den 25. Aug 2010 um 15:50 schrieb Norbert Preining:
> severity 593706 normal
Aha, if it breaks unrelated software and the whole system it is only
normal priority.
Debian quality gets more and more worse in my opinion. To lower high
important
severity 593706 normal
tag 593706 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Fr, 20 Aug 2010, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> The tool /usr/bin/install-info breaks the configuration in dpkg as dpkg
> uses install-info internal (dpkg, debconf, dpkg-reconfigure, I am not
> sure which exactly but that makes no sens e
On 20.08.10 Julian Gilbey (j...@debian.org) wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 02:52:49PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Hi,
> > The tool /usr/bin/install-info breaks the configuration in dpkg
> > as dpkg uses install-info internal (dpkg, debconf,
> > dpkg-reconfigure, I am not sure which exactly but t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Am Fr den 20. Aug 2010 um 16:59 schrieb Julian Gilbey:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 02:52:49PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > Package: install-info
> > Version: 4.13a.dfsg.1-5
> > Severity: critical
> >
> > The tool /usr/bin/install-info breaks th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Am Fr den 20. Aug 2010 um 17:37 schrieb Hilmar Preusse:
> > The bug is easily to fix. Just rename /usr/bin/install-info to
> > /usr/bin/broken-install-info and everything works well as the
> > /usr/sbin/install-info too is used now.
> >
> Don't
On 20.08.10 Klaus Ethgen (kl...@ethgen.de) wrote:
Hi,
> The bug is easily to fix. Just rename /usr/bin/install-info to
> /usr/bin/broken-install-info and everything works well as the
> /usr/sbin/install-info too is used now.
>
Don't think so:
hi...@sid:~ $ /usr/sbin/install-info
install-info: w
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 02:52:49PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Package: install-info
> Version: 4.13a.dfsg.1-5
> Severity: critical
>
> The tool /usr/bin/install-info breaks the configuration in dpkg as dpkg
> uses install-info internal (dpkg, debconf, dpkg-reconfigure, I am not
> sure which exac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Package: install-info
Version: 4.13a.dfsg.1-5
Severity: critical
The tool /usr/bin/install-info breaks the configuration in dpkg as dpkg
uses install-info internal (dpkg, debconf, dpkg-reconfigure, I am not
sure which exactly but that makes no sens
20 matches
Mail list logo
