Bug#593940: [Pkg-dns-devel] Bug#593940: Bug#593940: bind9utils: dnssec-{keygen, signzone} should not be in /usr/sbin

2018-06-23 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 02:35:18PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: Hi, > On Thu 2017-12-14 09:34:56 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > I think that best course of action would be to wait till January and > > fill an upstream issue in an upstream gitlab for BIND ;) > > i don't see any gitlab for

Bug#593940: [Pkg-dns-devel] Bug#593940: Bug#593940: bind9utils: dnssec-{keygen, signzone} should not be in /usr/sbin

2018-01-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Control: forwarded 593940 https://bugs.isc.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=46949 On Thu 2017-12-14 09:34:56 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > I think that best course of action would be to wait till January and > fill an upstream issue in an upstream gitlab for BIND ;) i don't see any gitlab for BIND,

Bug#593940: [Pkg-dns-devel] Bug#593940: Bug#593940: Bug#593940: bind9utils: dnssec-{keygen, signzone} should not be in /usr/sbin

2017-12-14 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On 14.12.2017 09:34, Ondřej Surý wrote: Hi everyone, > I think that best course of action would be to wait till January and > fill an upstream issue in an upstream gitlab for BIND ;) > > I think this is reasonable, but what about we change this in an upstream > first and then backport the

Bug#593940: [Pkg-dns-devel] Bug#593940: Bug#593940: bind9utils: dnssec-{keygen, signzone} should not be in /usr/sbin

2017-12-14 Thread Ondřej Surý
I think that best course of action would be to wait till January and fill an upstream issue in an upstream gitlab for BIND ;) I think this is reasonable, but what about we change this in an upstream first and then backport the change? O. -- Ondřej Surý On Wed, Dec 13, 2017,

Bug#593940: [Pkg-dns-devel] Bug#593940: bind9utils: dnssec-{keygen, signzone} should not be in /usr/sbin

2017-12-13 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi all-- On Wed 2017-12-13 16:00:26 +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + wontfix I don't think this is a good resolution for #593940, and i hope we can revert it. > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 03:41:49PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > >> Package: bind9utils >> Version:

Bug#593940: bind9utils: dnssec-{keygen,signzone} should not be in /usr/sbin

2017-12-13 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Control: tags -1 + wontfix On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 03:41:49PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: Hi, > Package: bind9utils > Version: 1:9.7.1.dfsg.P2-2 > Severity: normal > > Why are dnssec-{keygen,signzone} in /usr/sbin? They are perfectly usable > from normal user accounts and zone signing actions

Bug#593940: bind9utils: dnssec-{keygen,signzone} should not be in /usr/sbin

2017-09-29 Thread Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
Control: tags -1 +patch On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 15:41:49 +0200 Philipp Kern wrote: > Package: bind9utils > Version: 1:9.7.1.dfsg.P2-2 > Severity: normal > > Why are dnssec-{keygen,signzone} in /usr/sbin? They are perfectly usable > from normal user accounts and zone signing

Bug#593940: bind9utils: dnssec-{keygen,signzone} should not be in /usr/sbin

2010-08-22 Thread Philipp Kern
Package: bind9utils Version: 1:9.7.1.dfsg.P2-2 Severity: normal Why are dnssec-{keygen,signzone} in /usr/sbin? They are perfectly usable from normal user accounts and zone signing actions are not exactly carried through by system binaries as specified by the FHS. -- System Information: Debian