You are editing in the wrong place. The patch needs to be applied in
debian/build/source_amd64_none.
Ta. I applied the patch to every copy of tun.c other than the one in
source_amd64_openvz_amd64, and now the my trace is printed as it should
be.
And with the patch applied properly the
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 01:45 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Are you quite sure you used the modified kernel?
Nope.
'cat /proc/version' will tell you for sure which version you are
running.
$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.6.32-5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-20.2) (russell-deb...@stuart.id.au)
(gcc
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 21:47 +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
[...]
The steps I used to generate the kernel are:
$ apt-get source linux-2.6
$ cd linux-2.6-2.6.32
$ fakeroot debian/rules source
$ fakeroot debian/rules setup
$ patch -p1
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 09:27 +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 14:48 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 17:34 +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
The problem disappears in
linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64_2.6.35-1~experimental.2.
Yes, as I expected.
Can
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 14:48 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 17:34 +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
The problem disappears in
linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64_2.6.35-1~experimental.2.
Yes, as I expected.
Can you please test the attached patch against the version in unstable?
The problem disappears in
linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64_2.6.35-1~experimental.2.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 17:34 +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
The problem disappears in
linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64_2.6.35-1~experimental.2.
Yes, as I expected.
Can you please test the attached patch against the version in unstable?
Directions for rebuilding an official kernel package are at
7 matches
Mail list logo
