Bug#596733: unblock: ncbi-tools6/6.1.20100808-1 (as -2)

2010-10-13 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
retitle 596733 unblock: ncbi-tools6/6.1.20090809-2 tags 596733 + confirmed thanks On 10/03/2010 10:56 PM, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Mehdi Dogguy writes: > >> No, sorry. > > That's fair; I'll plan to go through backports, then. Should I upload > any of the packaging changes to unstable, or leave i

Bug#596733: unblock: ncbi-tools6/6.1.20100808-1 (as -2)

2010-10-03 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Mehdi Dogguy writes: > No, sorry. That's fair; I'll plan to go through backports, then. Should I upload any of the packaging changes to unstable, or leave it as is altogether? * debian/rules - Clean up compilation settings; in particular, use dpkg-buildflags rather than relying on

Bug#596733: unblock: ncbi-tools6/6.1.20100808-1 (as -2)

2010-10-03 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 09/13/2010 08:36 PM, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: At any rate, I uploaded my packages of the new release to experimental out of respect for the freeze, but would greatly appreciate it if you could please authorize a reupload to unstable with the intent of making it into squeeze. No, sorry. -- Mehdi

Bug#596733: unblock: ncbi-tools6/6.1.20100808-1 (as -2)

2010-09-13 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Greetings! ncbi-tools6 recently had its first upstream release in a year, issued a few days before your latest announcement. (As the version number indicates, the sources themselves are so