On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:28:47 +0200 Thomas Maass wrote:
> If i want to sync with horde3, always only a slow-sync is possible.
> This causes double entries.
This bug has likely been fixed in the last decade, please check
syncevolution version 2.0.0-3 from Debian testing/bookworm or later.
If you
On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 01:02 +0200, Thomas Maass wrote:
Package: syncevolution
Version: 1.2.99.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #599247
Hi again!
This bug is still there with the latest syncevolution package and horde4.
I wonder, that other funambol clients on other devices don't have this
problem.
Package: syncevolution
Version: 1.2.99.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #599247
Hi again!
This bug is still there with the latest syncevolution package and horde4.
I wonder, that other funambol clients on other devices don't have this
problem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT
Package: syncevolution
Version: 1.0+ds1~beta2a-1+b1
Severity: normal
Hi!
If i want to sync with horde3, always only a slow-sync is possible.
This causes double entries.
Maybe an update to the latest version 1.0.99.7 would solve this.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 07:28 +0100, Thomas Maass wrote:
If i want to sync with horde3, always only a slow-sync is possible.
This causes double entries.
Maybe an update to the latest version 1.0.99.7 would solve this.
I doubt that this depends on the version of SyncEvolution.
But you can try
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 09:21:30 +0200, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@intel.com wrote:
I doubt that this depends on the version of SyncEvolution.
But you can try that yourself. Please add
deb http://downloads.syncevolution.org/apt unstable main
to your apt sources and install
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 11:41 +0100, David Bremner wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 09:21:30 +0200, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@intel.com
wrote:
I doubt that this depends on the version of SyncEvolution.
But you can try that yourself. Please add
deb http://downloads.syncevolution.org/apt
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:23:06 +0200, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@intel.com wrote:
What would be easier to get included: another 1.0.x bug fix update
(which I hadn't intend to prepare in favor of releasing 1.1) or 1.1?
Probably a bug fix release; I think the diff with 1.1 is now too large
for
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 12:44 +0100, David Bremner wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:23:06 +0200, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@intel.com
wrote:
What would be easier to get included: another 1.0.x bug fix update
(which I hadn't intend to prepare in favor of releasing 1.1) or 1.1?
Probably a
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:06:41 +0200, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@intel.com wrote:
I moved this discussion to the please upgrade syncevolution bug.
Then also the diff between 1.0 beta 2 and the 1.0.x release series is
too large.
Ah, true, I should have thought of that. Then I suppose it probably
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:29 +0100, David Bremner wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:06:41 +0200, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@intel.com
wrote:
I moved this discussion to the please upgrade syncevolution bug.
Eh, how? ;-) The reply was still for 582376, the one about Horde. I'll
reply likewise, but
11 matches
Mail list logo
