Heya! I'm being for boyfriend!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
these three options are rather relevant
for Jessie than for Wheezy.
With regards to this bug (#599523), I guess it's not trivial to fix,
otherwise it would have been fixed already earlier. So if
update-manager won't be included in Jessie anyway, this bug possibly
may be a candidate for the wheezy-ignore
Hi,
Michael Biebl wrote:
On 16.06.2012 18:50, Arne Wichmann wrote:
Is there any progress on this serious bug? It is now unhandled for more
than one year.
update-manager is basically unmaintained atm.
So what about RFA'ing update-manager then at least?
Ignoring the epoch, Ubuntu has only
On 28.10.2012 12:52, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hi,
Michael Biebl wrote:
On 16.06.2012 18:50, Arne Wichmann wrote:
Is there any progress on this serious bug? It is now unhandled for more
than one year.
update-manager is basically unmaintained atm.
So what about RFA'ing update-manager then at
(replying to Axel)
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 05:58:02PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 28.10.2012 12:52, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hi,
Michael Biebl wrote:
On 16.06.2012 18:50, Arne Wichmann wrote:
Is there any progress on this serious bug? It is now unhandled for more
than one year.
Is there any progress on this serious bug? It is now unhandled for more
than one year.
cu
AW
--
[...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are
coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on
On 16.06.2012 18:50, Arne Wichmann wrote:
Is there any progress on this serious bug? It is now unhandled for more
than one year.
update-manager is basically unmaintained atm.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
Package: update-manager-core
Version: 0.200.5-1
Severity: normal
Please type your report here.
The text will be wrapped to be max 79 chars long per line.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 599523 squeeze-can-defer
tag 599523 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 14:01:19 +0200, Zoran Dzelajlija wrote:
Package: update-manager-gnome
Version: 0.200.4-1
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,
Quoting Evgeni Golov (evg...@debian.org):
Hi Zoran,
I fear your problem is your pinning.
I believe the problem is update-manager does not behave like
apt-preferences(5) says APT (or presumably any package manager) should.
Some reasoning below.
$ apt-cache policy libgl1-mesa-dri
Hi Zoran,
I fear your problem is your pinning.
$ apt-cache policy libgl1-mesa-dri
libgl1-mesa-dri:
Installed: 7.8.2-2
Candidate: 7.7.1-4
Package pin: 7.7.1-4
Version table:
*** 7.8.2-2 990
200 http://debian.iskon.hr/debian/ experimental/main i386 Packages
100
Package: update-manager-gnome
Version: 0.200.4-1
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
update-manager wants to downgrade a package I explicitely installed from
experimental without any special notice. This downgrade would break
functionality on my machine. apt and
12 matches
Mail list logo
