Bug#599650: impressive: Please change recommends on ghostscript-x and pdftk to suggests

2010-11-01 Thread Josh Triplett
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:49:05PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: I have thought about it and I have decided to stay with pdftk in recommends (since it significantly enhances the functionality and thus should commonly accompany impressive) and moved ghostscript-x (actually just ghostscript)

Bug#599650: impressive: Please change recommends on ghostscript-x and pdftk to suggests

2010-11-01 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
just grep pdftk /usr/bin/impressive and follow the output for notes On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Josh Triplett wrote: pdftk for. Would you consider elaborating on how it significantly enhances the functionality in the package description? it is not for describing what each dependency is used for --

Bug#599650: impressive: Please change recommends on ghostscript-x and pdftk to suggests

2010-10-31 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Hi Jon, I have thought about it and I have decided to stay with pdftk in recommends (since it significantly enhances the functionality and thus should commonly accompany impressive) and moved ghostscript-x (actually just ghostscript) into Suggests... that will close this bugreport (if you don't

Bug#599650: impressive: Please change recommends on ghostscript-x and pdftk to suggests

2010-10-09 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: impressive Version: 0.10.3~WIP+svn31-1 Severity: normal Impressive has Recommends on ghostscript-x and pdftk. However, these seem to support optional functionality of impressive, and don't seem like packages that would be found together with this one in all but unusual installations.