Bug#601220: orphaning noip2? (was: Re: Bug#601220: noip2: abuse of debconf)

2010-12-25 Thread Joost van Baal
Hi, Op Sat 25 Dec 2010 om 09:38:19 +0200 schreef Avi Rozen: On 12/25/2010 08:21 AM, Joost van Baal wrote: Andres Mejia wrote: snip this package should be orphaned. snip Is Avi Rozen no longer interested in working on the noip2 Debian package? Not really. If so, it should indeed

Bug#601220: orphaning noip2? (was: Re: Bug#601220: noip2: abuse of debconf)

2010-12-25 Thread Avi Rozen
On 12/25/2010 10:37 AM, Joost van Baal wrote: As for the current bug, I'd like to point out that noip2 configuration and runtime state has always been kept in a binary configuration file. This doesn't match the Debian policy, and the current abuse of debconf is the result of a our deliberate

Bug#601220: orphaning noip2? (was: Re: Bug#601220: noip2: abuse of debconf)

2010-12-24 Thread Joost van Baal
Hi, Andres Mejia wrote: snip this package should be orphaned. snip Is Avi Rozen no longer interested in working on the noip2 Debian package? If so, it should indeed get orphaned. Googling revealed: You should set the package maintainer to Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org and

Bug#601220: orphaning noip2? (was: Re: Bug#601220: noip2: abuse of debconf)

2010-12-24 Thread Avi Rozen
On 12/25/2010 08:21 AM, Joost van Baal wrote: Hi, Andres Mejia wrote: snip this package should be orphaned. snip Is Avi Rozen no longer interested in working on the noip2 Debian package? Not really. I'm still using no-ip.com services, but I've recently switched to using