On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:04:50AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Your package FTBFS on all architectures [0]. Here is a snippet from
i386[1]:
|daemon unit tests - C
|
| 22: daemon FAILED (daemon.at:11)
| 23: daemon --monitor
* Ben Pfaff | 2010-11-09 09:48:28 [-0800]:
These tests don't fail for me when I run them locally or on a Debian
machine (e.g. paganini.debian.org). The testsuite produces more
information for failed tests, in
_debian/tests/testsuite.dir/testnum/testsuite.log inside the top
source directory. Is
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:26:25PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
I just built via
| sbuild --apt-update --batch --dist=unstable --arch=powerpcspe \
|openvswitch_1.1.0~pre2-2
and got the same error message. On buildds it hang in the perl test case
but here it continued. I just
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:21:59PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:26:25PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
I just built via
| sbuild --apt-update --batch --dist=unstable --arch=powerpcspe \
|openvswitch_1.1.0~pre2-2
and got the same error message. On buildds
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:30:17PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Ben Pfaff | 2010-11-09 13:21:59 [-0800]:
Thanks for the hint. I was able to reproduce the problem locally with
sbuild. I'm sure that I can track it down now.
You got the part where I blamed sun_path for beeing
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:33:33PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:21:59PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:26:25PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
I just built via
| sbuild --apt-update --batch --dist=unstable --arch=powerpcspe \
|
reassign 602891 src:openvswitch
thanks
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:39:06PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
This isn't an sbuild issue, and we can't reliably work around it in
sbuild either, for the reasons stated above.
Thank you.
I agree, I'm reassigning it back to openvswitch (with this email).
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 03:54:25PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:33:33PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
We've had this issue before. Ultimately:
- we can mitigate the restriction by making the path shorter, but
we can't make any guarantees even than since package names
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:33:33PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
We've had this issue before. Ultimately:
- we can mitigate the restriction by making the path shorter, but
we can't make any guarantees even than since package names and
version numbers don't have any fixed limit. You still
9 matches
Mail list logo