Bug#603173: [backupninja] Re: Bug#603173: backupninja: missing dependency: bc

2011-04-26 Thread intrigeri
tags 603173 + fixed-upstream thanks Hi, I had a try and pushed cdcc2bc (Do arithmetic using bash rather than bc) to Git. Not tested, though. Rhatto, you'll probably want to merge and adapt this into your own, ongoing refactoring, rsync branch. Bye, -- intrigeri intrig...@boum.org | GnuPG

Bug#603173: backupninja: missing dependency: bc

2011-04-25 Thread intrigeri
Hi rhatto, andrea rota wrote (28 Nov 2010 14:11:40 GMT) : very likely depending on bc could be avoided completely by doing these basic interger arithmetics in other ways (bash itself or perl - my rough profiling shows that overhead is negligible) but this would be a whishlist+patch for

Bug#603173: backupninja: missing dependency: bc

2010-11-28 Thread andrea rota
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:07:41AM +0100, intrigeri wrote: rsync handler uses bc command (in function rotate and elsewhere in the handler) so i guess 'bc' should be listed as dependency. Most external tools that (at least) one backupninja handler uses are currently Suggest:'ed rather than

Bug#603173: backupninja: missing dependency: bc

2010-11-12 Thread intrigeri
rsync handler uses bc command (in function rotate and elsewhere in the handler) so i guess 'bc' should be listed as dependency. Most external tools that (at least) one backupninja handler uses are currently Suggest:'ed rather than hard dependencies (BTW, duplicity and rsync are not listed). So

Bug#603173: backupninja: missing dependency: bc

2010-11-11 Thread andrea rota
Package: backupninja Version: 0.9.6-4 Severity: normal rsync handler uses bc command (in function rotate and elsewhere in the handler) so i guess 'bc' should be listed as dependency. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.6 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: