Hi,
On 01/12/10 20:01, Michael Terry wrote:
OK, my understanding from the discussion with upstream is that 0.27 is
the unstable lead-up to a stable 0.28. For 0.28, the library and gir
names will remain as they are in 0.27 (libvte.so.9/libvte2_90.so.9 and
Vte-0.0.gir/Vte-2.90.gir).
Eventually v
OK, my understanding from the discussion with upstream is that 0.27 is
the unstable lead-up to a stable 0.28. For 0.28, the library and gir
names will remain as they are in 0.27 (libvte.so.9/libvte2_90.so.9 and
Vte-0.0.gir/Vte-2.90.gir).
Eventually vte will reach 1.0 and those gtk3 names will cha
Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 à 10:44 -0500, Michael Terry a écrit :
> > That's not really needed. The executables are in libexecdir, so just build
> > the
> > gtk+3 version with a different libexecdir, i.e. from debian/rules:
>
> Well, the only executable is /usr/lib/libvte9/gnome-pty-helper which
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 21:27 +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Ugh. I wonder why upstream is using that name and not libvte3.so.N or
> whatever.
> It sounds like they will change when they release an stable version, which
> doesn't sound like a good idea to me. Can you check this with upstre
Hi,
On 24/11/10 19:24, Michael Terry wrote:
In Ubuntu, I'm considering applying the attached patch to update to 0.27.2.
This does several things:
* Builds a gtk3 version of vte (libvte-2.90-9)
Ugh. I wonder why upstream is using that name and not libvte3.so.N or whatever.
It sounds like th
Package: vte
Version: 1:0.24.3-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu natty ubuntu-patch
In Ubuntu, I'm considering applying the attached patch to update to 0.27.2.
This does several things:
* Builds a gtk3 version of vte (libvte-2.90-9)
* Add
6 matches
Mail list logo
