On ons, 2010-12-08 at 22:02 +, Colin Watson wrote:
Can't system-tools-backends clean up the file that it had
erroneously
placed?
It would have to be done in a system-tools-backends maintainer script.
I'm not really sure why it's any better to do that in
system-tools-backends vs. in
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 07:29:11PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On ons, 2010-12-08 at 22:02 +, Colin Watson wrote:
It would have to be done in a system-tools-backends maintainer script.
I'm not really sure why it's any better to do that in
system-tools-backends vs. in ntp;
On tor, 2010-12-09 at 17:55 +, Colin Watson wrote:
I have no idea whether system-tools-backends is the only thing that
might create an empty /etc/ntp.conf. I don't see how you can have any
idea of that either?
Well, if you want to account for that, then almost every package will
have to
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 09:31:32PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On mån, 2010-12-06 at 12:35 +, Colin Watson wrote:
I entirely agree that this should be fixed in system-tools-backends,
and I've sent a patch upstream (I'll copy this to the Debian bug
shortly too). However, there are a
On ons, 2010-12-08 at 13:40 +, Colin Watson wrote:
I don't really agree with these changes. An empty ntp.conf is an error
and should not be masked.
What useful information can this state possibly convey?
That state that something is broken.
Why not just fix the GNOME side and let
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:46:31PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On ons, 2010-12-08 at 13:40 +, Colin Watson wrote:
I don't really agree with these changes. An empty ntp.conf is an error
and should not be masked.
What useful information can this state possibly convey?
That
On mån, 2010-12-06 at 12:35 +, Colin Watson wrote:
I entirely agree that this should be fixed in system-tools-backends,
and I've sent a patch upstream (I'll copy this to the Debian bug
shortly too). However, there are a couple of fairly unintrusive
things that could be changed in ntp to
7 matches
Mail list logo
