On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:30:13PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
I think it might be
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-desktop/packages/tags/desktop-base/6.0.5/splash/nightly-splash.png
(sorry it seems that inline view is broken there).
Just for reference: that can be fixed by
[ Adding ftpmaster to Cc. ftpmaster: please check bug log for context ]
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:32:05AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
I think I’m going to leave the Debian Project Leader deal with this.
Stefano, I’ll let you read the bug log . Maybe you’ll want to ask the
FTP masters too,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:32:05AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Hi,
Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 17:44 -0400, Karen Sandler a écrit :
Ah, I see the confusion here - the logos identified on that page are the
marks that have been registered, but GNOME, like Debian, has trademark
rights in
On Wed, June 29, 2011 4:39 am, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[ Adding ftpmaster to Cc. ftpmaster: please check bug log for context ]
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:32:05AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
I think Iâm going to leave the Debian Project Leader deal with this.
Stefano, Iâll let you
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 22:18 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
Hello GNOME foundation licensing team,
I am a user and contributor of the Debian distribution.
I have a question about the GNOME foot Logo.
The desktop-base Debian package includes an image which is derived
from the GNOME foot Logo.
Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 10:48 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
The desktop-base Debian package includes an image which is derived
from the GNOME foot Logo.
I am currently trying to properly document the copyright and license of
the GNOME foot Logo, but I wasn't able to find official
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 14:20 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 10:48 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
The desktop-base Debian package includes an image which is derived
from the GNOME foot Logo.
I am currently trying to properly document the copyright and license of
Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 13:45 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
It is my impression by reading the guidelines that the foot logo without
the GNOME text (as shipped by gnome-about) isn’t subject to the same
terms as the one with the text (as shipped by gnome-icon-theme). This
would be
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 15:01 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 13:45 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
It is my impression by reading the guidelines that the foot logo without
the GNOME text (as shipped by gnome-about) isn’t subject to the same
terms as the one with
On mar., 2011-06-28 at 15:01 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 13:45 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
It is my impression by reading the guidelines that the foot logo without
the GNOME text (as shipped by gnome-about) isn’t subject to the same
terms as the one with
Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 14:18 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
I think Francesco is talking about things like the logo on
http://pkg-gnome.alioth.debian.org/
(I don’t find it in desktop-base though, maybe we ship it in
gnome-icon-theme instead.)
This sort of thing is absolutely
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 15:58 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 14:18 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
I think Francesco is talking about things like the logo on
http://pkg-gnome.alioth.debian.org/
(I don’t find it in desktop-base though, maybe we ship it in
Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 15:06 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
This means we will have to remove any files containing the logo from our
packages, per the Debian guidelines. I’d really like to avoid that since
the impact is far more important than the pair of packages we are
talking about
Hi Josselin,
I'm a bit new to GNOME (just started as ED last week), so bear with me. I
do have a legal background though, so hopefully we can get this sorted out
in a quick and friendly way!
On Tue, June 28, 2011 10:31 am, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 28 juin 2011 Ã 15:06 +0100, Bastien
Hi,
Le mardi 28 juin 2011 à 17:44 -0400, Karen Sandler a écrit :
Ah, I see the confusion here - the logos identified on that page are the
marks that have been registered, but GNOME, like Debian, has trademark
rights in logos that it uses even if it hasn't registered them. And the
usage
Hello GNOME foundation licensing team,
I am a user and contributor of the Debian distribution.
I have a question about the GNOME foot Logo.
The desktop-base Debian package includes an image which is derived
from the GNOME foot Logo.
I am currently trying to properly document the copyright and
Hello GNOME foundation licensing team,
I am a user and contributor of the Debian distribution.
I have a question about the GNOME foot Logo.
The desktop-base Debian package includes an image which is derived
from the GNOME foot Logo.
I am currently trying to properly document the copyright and
Hello GNOME foundation licensing team,
I am a user and contributor of the Debian distribution.
I have a question about the GNOME foot Logo.
The desktop-base Debian package includes an image which is derived
from the GNOME foot Logo.
I am currently trying to properly document the copyright and
18 matches
Mail list logo
