On 26.12.10 أحمد المحمودي (aelmahmo...@sabily.org) wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 08:10:34PM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
Hi,
From the build log[3], I think that the hack seems to build luatex
statically:
---end quoted text---
Btw, I ran a debdiff between Ubuntu's builds of luatex (with
السلام عليكم،
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 03:50:10PM +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
So it just avoids some more static linking... If the resulting
binary is working as expected we can use the hack for all archs.
---end quoted text---
I just tried the patched version on a LaTeX file, it produced
On 25.12.10 أحمد المحمودي (aelmahmo...@sabily.org) wrote:
Hi,
Details can be found at this thread:
http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/dev-luatex/2010-December/004056.html
Especially that post:
http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/dev-luatex/2010-December/004060.html
*** /tmp/tmp1wbUri
In Ubuntu,
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 08:10:34PM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
From the build log[3], I think that the hack seems to build luatex statically:
---end quoted text---
Btw, I ran a debdiff between Ubuntu's builds of luatex (with
without the patch) on i386:
$ debdiff luatex_0.65.0-1_i386.deb
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 06:09:42PM +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
On 25.12.10 أحمد المحمودي (aelmahmo...@sabily.org) wrote:
* debian/patches/no_static_link.patch: Drop --enable-runtime-cxx-hack
from the default configuration, was causing armel FTBFS.
I don't really know what this
Package: luatex
Version: 0.65.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu natty ubuntu-patch
Details can be found at this thread:
http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/dev-luatex/2010-December/004056.html
Especially that post:
6 matches
Mail list logo
