Hi
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:00:20PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I said on IRC the debian/rules change was wrong, and for the rest I'd
like an ack/review from a perl person, which I'm not.
I don't know enough about
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:43:51 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:00:20PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I said on IRC the debian/rules change was wrong, and for the rest I'd
like an
Hi Julien
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 04:02:24PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:43:51 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:00:20PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 21:57:12 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Ok, no other changes done apart from the dh_clean -k call in the
install target. I have uploaded it now with urgency high (directly
without delay queue).
Unblocked, thanks.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I said on IRC the debian/rules change was wrong, and for the rest I'd
like an ack/review from a perl person, which I'm not.
I don't know enough about sockets and ipv6 to make real judgement,
but:
Julien, on the other side I
Hi Julien
First of all I'm not the maintainer and I'm not having that good IPv6
knowledge. Could you try if the patch inbetween the upstreams versions
2.55 and 2.56 solves the problem? The debdiff for a proposed NMU is
attached.
Could you try for that the package at [1]?
[1]
Hi Julien
I'm adding the Release-Team and in particular Masahito Omote to the
loop, as Masahito is the Maintainer.
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 12:42:37PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org wrote:
First of all I'm not the maintainer and I'm not having that good IPv6
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 13:07:54 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 12:42:37PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
All in all, 2.65 has been in unstable for over 110 days now and I've
been told the release team is OK with 2.65 but not with the packaging
changes and would
Hi all
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 01:25:09PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 13:07:54 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 12:42:37PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
All in all, 2.65 has been in unstable for over 110 days now and I've
been told the
9 matches
Mail list logo
