Bug#609301: Pattern rule without body is ignored

2011-02-16 Thread Jonathan Nieder
clone 609301 -1 reassign -1 make-doc retitle -1 make.info: missing "(or one you have defined yourself)" in "canceling implicit rules" section paragraph 2 quit Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Jonathan Nieder writes: >> Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >>> %-foo: bla-%-foo >>> >>> %-baz: bla-%-foo >>>

Bug#609301: Pattern rule without body is ignored

2011-02-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jonathan Nieder writes: > # tested with upstream HEAD (Check if the target-specific > # variable is the same as the global, 2010-11-30). > retitle 609301 make: document "canceling implicit rules" in a manual in > Debian (pattern rule without body is ignored) > severity 609301 minor > quit > > Hi

Bug#609301: Pattern rule without body is ignored

2011-02-14 Thread Jonathan Nieder
# tested with upstream HEAD (Check if the target-specific # variable is the same as the global, 2010-11-30). retitle 609301 make: document "canceling implicit rules" in a manual in Debian (pattern rule without body is ignored) severity 609301 minor quit Hi Goswin, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >

Bug#609301: Pattern rule without body is ignored

2011-01-08 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: make Version: 3.81-8 Severity: normal Hi, I've run into an odd behaviour with pattern rules. A pattern rule without a body is simply ignored: m...@frosties:~/t% cat Makefile %-foo: bla-%-foo %-baz: bla-%-foo $(info $@) bla-%-foo: $(info $@) touch $@ m...@frost