Bug#610257: Bug#610300: dropbox 1.0.17 distribution now complies to copyright complaints

2011-02-18 Thread Mike O'Connor
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:37:34 -0800, Vincent Cheng wrote: > As promised earlier, I've re-packaged Dropbox (based off of Ivan's work) and > have tried to address the licensing issues in the packaging. I would be > grateful if any Debian developers/maintainers could look through my > packaging and h

Bug#610257: Bug#610300: dropbox 1.0.17 distribution now complies to copyright complaints

2011-02-05 Thread Vincent Cheng
In response to Mike, you wouldn't find the source code for the Dropbox daemon in any release, as it is proprietary (but still distributable, hence non-free). However, Dropbox's Nautilus plugin is open source, and licensed under the GPLv3 (Rian, please correct me if I'm wrong). Ivan's original Dropb

Bug#610257: Bug#610300: dropbox 1.0.17 distribution now complies to copyright complaints

2011-01-25 Thread Mike O'Connor
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:41:47 -0800 (PST), Rian Hunter wrote: > hi all > > we recently released a distribution of dropbox that corrects all the > complains listed in these debian bug reports. thanks for the feedback, > please let me know if there is anything i can do to make dropbox comply to >

Bug#610257: Bug#610300: dropbox 1.0.17 distribution now complies to copyright complaints

2011-01-25 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 25.01.2011 00:41, schrieb Rian Hunter: > we recently released a distribution of dropbox that corrects all the > complains listed in these debian bug reports. thanks for the feedback, > please let me know if there is anything i can do to make dropbox comply > to any more possible copyright